Nothing bundt cakes strawberries and cream
Nothing, the complete absence of anything, has been a matter of philosophical debate since at least the 5th century BC. Early Greek philosophers argued that nothing bundt cakes strawberries and cream was impossible for nothing to exist.
The atomists allowed nothing but only in the spaces between the invisibly small atoms. For them, all space was filled with atoms. Some writers have made connections between Heidegger’s concept of nothing and the nirvana of Eastern religions. Modern science does not equate vacuum with nothing. Indeed, the vacuum in quantum field theory is filled with virtual particles. The quantum vacuum is often viewed as a modern version of an aether theory. Some would consider the study of “nothing” to be foolish.
God had created out of nothingness. However, “nothingness” has been treated as a serious subject for a very long time. In philosophy, to avoid linguistic traps over the meaning of “nothing”, a phrase such as not-being is often employed to make clear what is being discussed. Greek philosopher of the monist school. He argued that “nothing” cannot exist by the following line of reasoning: To speak of a thing, one has to speak of a thing that exists. Parmenides was taken seriously by other philosophers, influencing, for instance, Socrates and Plato.
Aristotle gives Parmenides serious consideration but concludes, “Although these opinions seem to follow logically in a dialectical discussion, yet to believe them seems next door to madness when one considers the facts. In modern times, Albert Einstein’s concept of spacetime has led many scientists, including Einstein himself, to adopt a position remarkably similar to Parmenides. He accepted the monist position that there could be no motion without a void. The void is the opposite of being. Parmenides’ attempts to work from pure logic. Parmenides by distinguishing things that are matter and things that are space.
In this scenario, space is not “nothing” but, rather, a receptacle in which objects of matter can be placed. The idea that space can actually be empty was generally still not accepted by philosophers who invoked arguments similar to the plenum reasoning. Although Descartes views on this were challenged by Blaise Pascal, he declined to overturn the traditional belief, horror vacui, commonly stated as “nature abhors a vacuum”. His ideas mostly stem from, or are based on his work of translating pseudo-Dionysius.
According to Hegel in Science of Logic, the dialectical methods consists of three steps. You can help by adding to it. The understanding of “nothing” varies widely between cultures, especially between Western and Eastern cultures and philosophical traditions. In some Eastern philosophies, the concept of “nothingness” is characterized by an egoless state of being in which one fully realizes one’s own small part in the cosmos.
The Kyoto School handles the concept of nothingness as well. Laozi and Zhuangzi were both conscious that language is powerless in the face of the ultimate. Taoists also have the related concept of wu wei. Despite the proven existence of vacuum, scientists through the 17th to 19th centuries thought there must be a medium pervading all space that allowed the transmission of light or gravity. Thus, in this period, it was not accepted that complete nothing was possible.
