Chicken broccoli rice casserole

For the natural phenomenon, see Chicken broccoli rice casserole. The game of chicken models two drivers, both headed for a single-lane bridge from opposite directions. The first to swerve away yields the bridge to the other.

If neither player swerves, the result is a costly deadlock in the middle of the bridge, or a potentially fatal head-on collision. The phrase game of chicken is also used as a metaphor for a situation where two parties engage in a showdown where they have nothing to gain, and only pride stops them from backing down. Since the nuclear stalemate became apparent, the Governments of East and West have adopted the policy which Mr. This is a policy adapted from a sport which, I am told, is practiced by some youthful degenerates.

Brinkmanship involves the introduction of an element of uncontrollable risk: even if all players act rationally in the face of risk, uncontrollable events can still trigger the catastrophic outcome. If both players choose the Hawk strategy, then they fight until one is injured and the other wins. A formal version of the game of Chicken has been the subject of serious research in game theory. Dove are anti-coordination games, in which it is mutually beneficial for the players to play different strategies. In this way, it can be thought of as the opposite of a coordination game, where playing the same strategy Pareto dominates playing different strategies.

Because the loss of swerving is so trivial compared to the crash that occurs if nobody swerves, the reasonable strategy would seem to be to swerve before a crash is likely. Yet, knowing this, if one believes one’s opponent to be reasonable, one may well decide not to swerve at all, in the belief that the opponent will be reasonable and decide to swerve, leaving the first player the winner. Dove game was by John Maynard Smith and George Price in their paper, “The logic of animal conflict”. The exact value of the Dove vs. Dove payoff varies between model formulations. Dove game to investigate a number of biologically relevant factors.

One tactic in the game is for one party to signal their intentions convincingly before the game begins. For example, if one party were to ostentatiously disable their steering wheel just before the match, the other party would be compelled to swerve. This shows that, in some circumstances, reducing one’s own options can be a good strategy. Players may also make non-binding threats to not swerve. 5 – Reaction correspondences for both players in a discoordination game.